Rule and urgent nisi application

Home » Randfontein » Urgent application and rule nisi

Randfontein - Urgent Application And Rule Nisi

in Randfontein

FREE STATE HIGH COURT BLOEMFONTEIN In the application of-

urgent application and rule nisi

University interdicts what do they mean and to whom do they. A rule nisi is basically an interim order granted by a court when the person against whom the order is made, must on a return court date, come to court to give evidence as to why a final order in that specific matter should not be made. In other words it is basically a provisional court order. I was involved in a case, where the mother of the child had taken the child and moved in with her family in a different …, 01-08-2016 · The return date of the rule nisi annexed hereto as ANNEXURE "X" is extended to the unopposed roll of 9 September 2016. The order of his Lordship Mavundla J granted on 18 February 2016 in this matter and declared to operate as interim interdicts with immediate effect by his Lordship Tuchten J under case number 11929/2016 on 28 February 2016 continues to operate as interim interdicts until ….

FREE STATE HIGH COURT BLOEMFONTEIN In the application of-

Rule nisi in a custody matter capetownlawyer.co.za. 01-08-2016 · The return date of the rule nisi annexed hereto as ANNEXURE "X" is extended to the unopposed roll of 9 September 2016. The order of his Lordship Mavundla J granted on 18 February 2016 in this matter and declared to operate as interim interdicts with immediate effect by his Lordship Tuchten J under case number 11929/2016 on 28 February 2016 continues to operate as interim interdicts until …, 06-11-2016 · A rule nisi is usually a temporary court order granted without notice to the other party (Respondent). It is usually an urgent interdict granted, where the applicant can prove he will be.

[1] On 5 November 2010 the two Applicants launched an application on an urgent basis for the following relief as contained in their Notice of Motion: “1. Condoning the non-compliance with the Rules of this Honourable Court, and hearing the application on an urgent basis as envisaged by Rule 6 (12) of the aforesaid Rules. 2. That a Rule Nisi By way of an urgent ex parte application lodged on 20 March 2014, the appellant obtained a rule nisi from the magistrate’s court on the same day. The rule nisi is in the following terms – “ 1. The Rules of this honourable Court pertaining to service and notice to be dispensed with and the matter be heard as of urgency. 2.

Rule nisi If some other party’s rights are affected, the court will grant a rule nisi. A rule nisi is an interim order, in which the respondent or other interested party is told to come to court on a future date (the return date), in order to show cause why the interim order should not be made a final order of court. [1] On 5 November 2010 the two Applicants launched an application on an urgent basis for the following relief as contained in their Notice of Motion: “1. Condoning the non-compliance with the Rules of this Honourable Court, and hearing the application on an urgent basis as envisaged by Rule 6 (12) of the aforesaid Rules. 2. That a Rule Nisi

30-01-2017 · The particulars should, however, be as concise as possible consistent with providing the necessary evidence. 1.3 Where it is necessary in some way to amend an application for a matrimonial order or a civil partnership order, there are distinctions to be drawn between an amended application, a supplemental application and a further application – (a) an amended application might be used to add … – On the extended return day of a rule . nisi. issued on 20 December 2018 the respondent is entitled to show cause why the order which is in the form of a rule . nisi. should not be made final – That reasonably includes showing that the matter should not have been heard on an urgent basis – Court finding that on the facts urgency was self

[6] UCT launched an urgent application when a member of the campus security received a threat of arson directed at the University’s buildings. It obtained an interim interdict against several people (some registered students and others not – including the applicants).4 On the return date of the rule nisi UCT applied, successfully, for This is the return day of a rule nisi, which was granted by agreement following an urgent application on 29 July 2010. The application is one to stay a writ of execution issued by the second respondent, the Registrar of the Labour Court, and the warrant of execution effected by the Sheriff of the High Court, the third respondent, on 12 July and

01-08-2016 · The return date of the rule nisi annexed hereto as ANNEXURE "X" is extended to the unopposed roll of 9 September 2016. The order of his Lordship Mavundla J granted on 18 February 2016 in this matter and declared to operate as interim interdicts with immediate effect by his Lordship Tuchten J under case number 11929/2016 on 28 February 2016 continues to operate as interim interdicts until … A Rule Nisi do issue returnable on the 13th January 2006 calling upon the Respondent to attend before this court to show cause, if any, why the following order should not be made final: 1.1 That the normal rules relating to service be and are hereby dispensed with and this matter treated as an urgent application.

1. that this application be heard as an urgent application in terms of the provisions of rule 6(12) of the Uniform Rules of Court and that the non-compliance with the normal rules and prescribed procedures in regard to form, notice, service and time periods be dispensed with; 2. that the Applicant be granted leave, in terms of section 157(1)(d 15-08-2013В В· In this scenario it may be possible for you to make an application to court to shorten the time period between Decree Nisi and Decree Absolute. This is known as an application to expedite the

01-08-2016 · The return date of the rule nisi annexed hereto as ANNEXURE "X" is extended to the unopposed roll of 9 September 2016. The order of his Lordship Mavundla J granted on 18 February 2016 in this matter and declared to operate as interim interdicts with immediate effect by his Lordship Tuchten J under case number 11929/2016 on 28 February 2016 continues to operate as interim interdicts until … 1. that this application be heard as an urgent application in terms of the provisions of rule 6(12) of the Uniform Rules of Court and that the non-compliance with the normal rules and prescribed procedures in regard to form, notice, service and time periods be dispensed with; 2. that the Applicant be granted leave, in terms of section 157(1)(d

LawyerServices Members' Log In . BOMBAY HIGH COURT ORIGINAL SIDE RULES, w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n Not long after settling the application I received a call from my in-structing attorney together with the first set back. The application was mistakenly set down on the wrong roll. Not motion court on an ex parte-ish basis with limited relief and a rule nisi as planned, but urgent court. I felt faint.

27-03-2012 · 1.what does it mean "do issue a rule nisi for a provisional winding" and that " the matter be heard as one of urgency" ? . 2. When and in what circumstances is a "rule nisi" for an urgent provisional winding up order granted ? 3.what will happen if one files a "notice of opposition and answering affidavit (denying the facts of the founding affidavit) " before the matter is in court - i.e. the notice of motion … Not long after settling the application I received a call from my in-structing attorney together with the first set back. The application was mistakenly set down on the wrong roll. Not motion court on an ex parte-ish basis with limited relief and a rule nisi as planned, but urgent court. I felt faint.

That the non-compliance with rules of the High Court of Namibia relating to forms and service is hereby condoned as is envisaged in Rule 6 (12) of the aforesaid rules and that the application is heard as a matter of urgency. That a . rule nisi. is hereby issued calling upon the respondents to show cause, if any, on [6] UCT launched an urgent application when a member of the campus security received a threat of arson directed at the University’s buildings. It obtained an interim interdict against several people (some registered students and others not – including the applicants).4 On the return date of the rule nisi UCT applied, successfully, for

That the non-compliance with rules of the High Court of Namibia relating to forms and service is hereby condoned as is envisaged in Rule 6 (12) of the aforesaid rules and that the application is heard as a matter of urgency. That a . rule nisi. is hereby issued calling upon the respondents to show cause, if any, on Facts. The appellant close corporation had, without notice, brought an urgent ex parte application seeking a rule nisi with interim effect against the first and second respondents. The order, referred to as an Anton Piller order by counsel, was granted by the High Court. The order provided for the removal of goods by the sheriff and the handing over of those goods to the appellant.

LawyerServices Members' Log In . BOMBAY HIGH COURT ORIGINAL SIDE RULES, w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n Not long after settling the application I received a call from my in-structing attorney together with the first set back. The application was mistakenly set down on the wrong roll. Not motion court on an ex parte-ish basis with limited relief and a rule nisi as planned, but urgent court. I felt faint.

The final point in limine is whether or not the application is urgent thereby entitling the applicants to a rule nisi. The respondents have argued that the applicants have not set out the circumstances that render the matter urgent and why they cannot get substantial relief in due course as required by Order 12 rule 12(2) of the Rules of the It was brought as an urgent application, on notice, and was decided only on the applicant’s launching affidavit. Although it was opposed by the respondents on the date of hearing, their answering affidavits, including the applicants’ replying affidavit, were only filed and served after the Rule Nisi was issued and the

By way of an urgent ex parte application lodged on 20 March 2014, the appellant obtained a rule nisi from the magistrate’s court on the same day. The rule nisi is in the following terms – “ 1. The Rules of this honourable Court pertaining to service and notice to be dispensed with and the matter be heard as of urgency. 2. 01-11-2019 · One stop shop: Urgent application refused. Posted by GilesFiles Nov 1, 2019 2019, abuse of process, Applications, Appointed LC judges, Courts, Dispute Resolution (LRL 3), Edwin Tlhotlhalemaje, Interdicts and rule nisi, Judges, Labour Court, Labour court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, Labour Relations Act 1995, LC Practice Manual, Legal Practice, LRA Chpt: 7: s112-184 Dispute …

– On the extended return day of a rule . nisi. issued on 20 December 2018 the respondent is entitled to show cause why the order which is in the form of a rule . nisi. should not be made final – That reasonably includes showing that the matter should not have been heard on an urgent basis – Court finding that on the facts urgency was self [1] On 5 November 2010 the two Applicants launched an application on an urgent basis for the following relief as contained in their Notice of Motion: “1. Condoning the non-compliance with the Rules of this Honourable Court, and hearing the application on an urgent basis as envisaged by Rule 6 (12) of the aforesaid Rules. 2. That a Rule Nisi

07-11-2016 · University interdicts: what do they mean and to whom do they apply? 7 November 2016 By Safura Abdool Karim. In the wake of Fees Must Fall protests, institutions are using the courts to complete the academic year Photo: Masixole Feni 7 November 2016 - By Safura Abdool Karim. Last week, Rhodes University was in the Grahamstown High Court arguing for the finalisaton of an interim interdict … The final point in limine is whether or not the application is urgent thereby entitling the applicants to a rule nisi. The respondents have argued that the applicants have not set out the circumstances that render the matter urgent and why they cannot get substantial relief in due course as required by Order 12 rule 12(2) of the Rules of the

08-11-2012 · In these cases the court (if it grants the interim interdict) will issue a rule nisi, which will order the respondent to come before the court on a particular date, to show cause as to why the interim interdict should not be made a final interdict;• if the matter is urgent, the application may be brought ex parte, with a rule nisi granted A rule nisi is basically an interim order granted by a court when the person against whom the order is made, must on a return court date, come to court to give evidence as to why a final order in that specific matter should not be made. In other words it is basically a provisional court order. I was involved in a case, where the mother of the child had taken the child and moved in with her family in a different …

[2] The first application, which I will refer to as the main application, served before the Urgent Court of this Division to halt a land invasion. A Rule Nisi was granted in the absence of the 1st respondents, who were at the time cited as the “Unknown individuals trespassing or attempting to invade 27-03-2012 · 1.what does it mean "do issue a rule nisi for a provisional winding" and that " the matter be heard as one of urgency" ? . 2. When and in what circumstances is a "rule nisi" for an urgent provisional winding up order granted ? 3.what will happen if one files a "notice of opposition and answering affidavit (denying the facts of the founding affidavit) " before the matter is in court - i.e. the notice of motion …

Ernst Roets maintains innocence after he tweeted banned

urgent application and rule nisi

Memory Institute SA v Hansen Wikipedia. It was brought as an urgent application, on notice, and was decided only on the applicant’s launching affidavit. Although it was opposed by the respondents on the date of hearing, their answering affidavits, including the applicants’ replying affidavit, were only filed and served after the Rule Nisi was issued and the, A Rule Nisi do issue returnable on the 13th January 2006 calling upon the Respondent to attend before this court to show cause, if any, why the following order should not be made final: 1.1 That the normal rules relating to service be and are hereby dispensed with and this matter treated as an urgent application..

FREE STATE HIGH COURT BLOEMFONTEIN In the application of-

urgent application and rule nisi

University interdicts what do they mean and to whom do they. [2] The first application, which I will refer to as the main application, served before the Urgent Court of this Division to halt a land invasion. A Rule Nisi was granted in the absence of the 1st respondents, who were at the time cited as the “Unknown individuals trespassing or attempting to invade https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion:Ren%C3%A9_Gu%C3%A9non/Archive_5 15-08-2013 · In this scenario it may be possible for you to make an application to court to shorten the time period between Decree Nisi and Decree Absolute. This is known as an application to expedite the.

urgent application and rule nisi

  • Miljo and Another v Minister of Safety and Security and Others (A
  • Ernst Roets maintains innocence after he tweeted banned

  • 25-05-2017В В· That the Honourable Court issue a Rule Nisi calling the Respondent to show cause, if any provided for in the rules of the above Honourable Court be dispensed with and that the matter be treated as an urgent application in terms of Rule 6(12) of the Uniform Rules of Court. 2. That the alleged parenting plan which was concluded on 09 March 2017 between the Applicant and the First … Summary: The applicants launched an urgent application for a rule nisi calling upon the respondents to show cause why inter alia the second respondent and anybody acting on his behalf should not be prevented from removing certain movable property under the control and care of the second applicant pending the finalisation of a deceased estate. The rule nisi also called for an order directing the …

    1. That applicant’s non-compliance with the provisions of rule 6(12) of the rules of this Honourable Court is condoned and leave is granted to the applicant to bring this application on an urgent basis. 2. That a rule nisi do hereby issue calling upon the Respondent to show cause, if any, to this Court of Friday 10 November 2000 at 10h00 why: Applicant then sought an urgent interdict ejecting them from Applicant‟s branches and interdicting and restraining them from promoting illegal industrial action, entering Applicant‟s premises unless for purposes of tendering their services, and causing disruption and damage at Applicant‟s premises. Service of the rule nisi was effected, but no attempt was made by Second Respondent to encourage or request …

    06-11-2016 · A rule nisi is usually a temporary court order granted without notice to the other party (Respondent). It is usually an urgent interdict granted, where the applicant can prove he will be 3 JUDGMENT The issue for decision (Being a Notice to anticipate a Rule nisi granted ex parte) [1] On the 8th July, 2016 the Applicants in the present proceedings brought an Urgent and Ex parte Application before this court, seeking, inter alia that the 1st Respondent’s bank accounts as held by the 16th Respondent be frozen pending finalization of these proceedings.

    Facts. The appellant close corporation had, without notice, brought an urgent ex parte application seeking a rule nisi with interim effect against the first and second respondents. The order, referred to as an Anton Piller order by counsel, was granted by the High Court. The order provided for the removal of goods by the sheriff and the handing over of those goods to the appellant. 1. That applicant’s non-compliance with the provisions of rule 6(12) of the rules of this Honourable Court is condoned and leave is granted to the applicant to bring this application on an urgent basis. 2. That a rule nisi do hereby issue calling upon the Respondent to show cause, if any, to this Court of Friday 10 November 2000 at 10h00 why:

    Summary: The applicants launched an urgent application for a rule nisi calling upon the respondents to show cause why inter alia the second respondent and anybody acting on his behalf should not be prevented from removing certain movable property under the control and care of the second applicant pending the finalisation of a deceased estate. The rule nisi also called for an order directing the … Applicant then sought an urgent interdict ejecting them from Applicant‟s branches and interdicting and restraining them from promoting illegal industrial action, entering Applicant‟s premises unless for purposes of tendering their services, and causing disruption and damage at Applicant‟s premises. Service of the rule nisi was effected, but no attempt was made by Second Respondent to encourage or request …

    08-11-2012 · In these cases the court (if it grants the interim interdict) will issue a rule nisi, which will order the respondent to come before the court on a particular date, to show cause as to why the interim interdict should not be made a final interdict;• if the matter is urgent, the application may be brought ex parte, with a rule nisi granted A Rule Nisi do issue returnable on the 13th January 2006 calling upon the Respondent to attend before this court to show cause, if any, why the following order should not be made final: 1.1 That the normal rules relating to service be and are hereby dispensed with and this matter treated as an urgent application.

    26-09-2017 · The second applicant was to be specifically excluded from any costs order.(17)[11] On 2 August 2016, the rule nisi was further extended to 10 October 2016. On that date, the application was postponed sine die (without assigning a day for further hearing), and the rule nisi was extended until it was confirmed or discharged.[18] High Court 1. That applicant’s non-compliance with the provisions of rule 6(12) of the rules of this Honourable Court is condoned and leave is granted to the applicant to bring this application on an urgent basis. 2. That a rule nisi do hereby issue calling upon the Respondent to show cause, if any, to this Court of Friday 10 November 2000 at 10h00 why:

    That the non-compliance with rules of the High Court of Namibia relating to forms and service is hereby condoned as is envisaged in Rule 6 (12) of the aforesaid rules and that the application is heard as a matter of urgency. That a . rule nisi. is hereby issued calling upon the respondents to show cause, if any, on 15-08-2013В В· In this scenario it may be possible for you to make an application to court to shorten the time period between Decree Nisi and Decree Absolute. This is known as an application to expedite the

    The matter, Solomon noted, was set down on urgency on May 7, 2018 and the respondent not having been served as yet, a decree nisi (rule or order upon condition that is to become absolute unless 15-08-2013В В· In this scenario it may be possible for you to make an application to court to shorten the time period between Decree Nisi and Decree Absolute. This is known as an application to expedite the

    A Rule Nisi do issue returnable on the 13th January 2006 calling upon the Respondent to attend before this court to show cause, if any, why the following order should not be made final: 1.1 That the normal rules relating to service be and are hereby dispensed with and this matter treated as an urgent application. 1. that this application be heard as an urgent application in terms of the provisions of rule 6(12) of the Uniform Rules of Court and that the non-compliance with the normal rules and prescribed procedures in regard to form, notice, service and time periods be dispensed with; 2. that the Applicant be granted leave, in terms of section 157(1)(d

    26-09-2017В В· The second applicant was to be specifically excluded from any costs order.(17)[11] On 2 August 2016, the rule nisi was further extended to 10 October 2016. On that date, the application was postponed sine die (without assigning a day for further hearing), and the rule nisi was extended until it was confirmed or discharged.[18] High Court [3] The basis of the application is that the applicant had not been served with the main application, but, that he was only served with the Rule Nisi; the application had been made ex parte resulting in the granting of the Rule Nisi. It is Common Cause that the Rule Nisi was issued on the 19th February 2010 and subsequently confirmed on the

    07-11-2016 · University interdicts: what do they mean and to whom do they apply? 7 November 2016 By Safura Abdool Karim. In the wake of Fees Must Fall protests, institutions are using the courts to complete the academic year Photo: Masixole Feni 7 November 2016 - By Safura Abdool Karim. Last week, Rhodes University was in the Grahamstown High Court arguing for the finalisaton of an interim interdict … That the non-compliance with rules of the High Court of Namibia relating to forms and service is hereby condoned as is envisaged in Rule 6 (12) of the aforesaid rules and that the application is heard as a matter of urgency. That a . rule nisi. is hereby issued calling upon the respondents to show cause, if any, on

    Rule nisi If some other party’s rights are affected, the court will grant a rule nisi. A rule nisi is an interim order, in which the respondent or other interested party is told to come to court on a future date (the return date), in order to show cause why the interim order should not be made a final order of court. [3] The basis of the application is that the applicant had not been served with the main application, but, that he was only served with the Rule Nisi; the application had been made ex parte resulting in the granting of the Rule Nisi. It is Common Cause that the Rule Nisi was issued on the 19th February 2010 and subsequently confirmed on the

    That the non-compliance with rules of the High Court of Namibia relating to forms and service is hereby condoned as is envisaged in Rule 6 (12) of the aforesaid rules and that the application is heard as a matter of urgency. That a . rule nisi. is hereby issued calling upon the respondents to show cause, if any, on an application for condonation for the late filing of this application. The appeal before the Supreme Court of Appeal by the National Commissioner of Police and the Minister of Safety and Security2 (respondents) was against a costs order made by the North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria3 (High Court) in an urgent bail application.

    LawyerServices Members' Log In . BOMBAY HIGH COURT ORIGINAL SIDE RULES, w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n Facts. The appellant close corporation had, without notice, brought an urgent ex parte application seeking a rule nisi with interim effect against the first and second respondents. The order, referred to as an Anton Piller order by counsel, was granted by the High Court. The order provided for the removal of goods by the sheriff and the handing over of those goods to the appellant.

    27-03-2012 · 1.what does it mean "do issue a rule nisi for a provisional winding" and that " the matter be heard as one of urgency" ? . 2. When and in what circumstances is a "rule nisi" for an urgent provisional winding up order granted ? 3.what will happen if one files a "notice of opposition and answering affidavit (denying the facts of the founding affidavit) " before the matter is in court - i.e. the notice of motion … an application for condonation for the late filing of this application. The appeal before the Supreme Court of Appeal by the National Commissioner of Police and the Minister of Safety and Security2 (respondents) was against a costs order made by the North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria3 (High Court) in an urgent bail application.

    – On the extended return day of a rule . nisi. issued on 20 December 2018 the respondent is entitled to show cause why the order which is in the form of a rule . nisi. should not be made final – That reasonably includes showing that the matter should not have been heard on an urgent basis – Court finding that on the facts urgency was self 1. that this application be heard as an urgent application in terms of the provisions of rule 6(12) of the Uniform Rules of Court and that the non-compliance with the normal rules and prescribed procedures in regard to form, notice, service and time periods be dispensed with; 2. that the Applicant be granted leave, in terms of section 157(1)(d

    It was brought as an urgent application, on notice, and was decided only on the applicant’s launching affidavit. Although it was opposed by the respondents on the date of hearing, their answering affidavits, including the applicants’ replying affidavit, were only filed and served after the Rule Nisi was issued and the This is the return day of a rule nisi, which was granted by agreement following an urgent application on 29 July 2010. The application is one to stay a writ of execution issued by the second respondent, the Registrar of the Labour Court, and the warrant of execution effected by the Sheriff of the High Court, the third respondent, on 12 July and

    A Rule Nisi do issue returnable on the 13th January 2006 calling upon the Respondent to attend before this court to show cause, if any, why the following order should not be made final: 1.1 That the normal rules relating to service be and are hereby dispensed with and this matter treated as an urgent application. 27-03-2012 · 1.what does it mean "do issue a rule nisi for a provisional winding" and that " the matter be heard as one of urgency" ? . 2. When and in what circumstances is a "rule nisi" for an urgent provisional winding up order granted ? 3.what will happen if one files a "notice of opposition and answering affidavit (denying the facts of the founding affidavit) " before the matter is in court - i.e. the notice of motion …

    urgent application and rule nisi

    [6] UCT launched an urgent application when a member of the campus security received a threat of arson directed at the University’s buildings. It obtained an interim interdict against several people (some registered students and others not – including the applicants).4 On the return date of the rule nisi UCT applied, successfully, for 25-05-2017 · That the Honourable Court issue a Rule Nisi calling the Respondent to show cause, if any provided for in the rules of the above Honourable Court be dispensed with and that the matter be treated as an urgent application in terms of Rule 6(12) of the Uniform Rules of Court. 2. That the alleged parenting plan which was concluded on 09 March 2017 between the Applicant and the First …